← Back to SciGround

Sample report / Synthetic data

A result with its evidence.

Explore the corrected body-weight comparison and its source records. This is a worked illustration, not a product-issued verification record or a real animal study.

SciGround / Research reportIllustrative · Synthetic data

Two-group comparison / Corrected input

Body weight at day 14

Example 001
Revision 02

Body weight (g)

Individual body weights in control and treatment groupsTen synthetic animals per group. Control mean24.92g; treatment mean22.84g. Horizontal bars show group means. M17 is highlighted in Control at26.2g. Each dot is one animal.21222324252627M01: 24.1 g, ControlM02: 25.2 g, ControlM03: 23.8 g, ControlM04: 26.0 g, ControlM05: 24.7 g, ControlM06: 25.5 g, ControlM07: 23.9 g, ControlM08: 24.8 g, ControlM09: 25.0 g, ControlM17: 26.2 g, ControlControln = 10M10: 22.8 g, TreatmentM11: 23.4 g, TreatmentM12: 21.9 g, TreatmentM13: 24.1 g, TreatmentM14: 22.6 g, TreatmentM15: 23.0 g, TreatmentM16: 22.2 g, TreatmentM18: 23.7 g, TreatmentM19: 21.8 g, TreatmentM20: 22.9 g, TreatmentTreatmentn = 10M17
Each dot is one animal. Lines show group means.

Treatment − Control

−2.08g

95% CI −2.83 to −1.33 g

Mean body weight was lower in the treatment group in this illustrative dataset.

Group summaries
GroupnMean (g)
Control1024.92
Treatment1022.84

Two-sided Welch t-test · p = 0.00001584

Method & conditions

One measurement per animal at day 14. Independent observations and approximately normal outcomes assumed. Welch inference is approximate.

What this does not establish

Measurement accuracy, independence, or a causal treatment effect. All 20 supplied animals are included; no exclusions.

Follow the evidence
Input correspondence

M17 → Control → 26.2 g

Animal ID
M17
Source group
Control
Day 14 weight
26.2 g

The corrected group agrees with the supplied source row. The same value appears in the figure and contributes to the Control mean.

Download the synthetic source CSV ↗
Calculation basis

20 observations. One comparison.

Welch t = −5.85; df = 17.817. The interval uses the same group direction as the reported difference. Values are rounded for display.

Computed illustrative values, not an issued SciGround verification record.

Declared, not verified

Research assumptions stay visible.

Agreement with a supplied record does not prove true animal identity, accurate measurements, random assignment, or absence of cage effects.

What changed?

M17 was assigned to Treatment in the earlier analysis input. The supplied source records place it in Control. The correction changes its group, while retaining its 26.2 g measurement and all 20 animals.

Comparison before and after the source-based correction
ResultEarlier inputCorrected input
Control / Treatment n9 / 1110 / 10
Mean difference (g)-1.63-2.08
95% CI (g)-2.58 to -0.68-2.83 to -1.33

Both versions remain distinguishable. A prior result is not automatically evidence for corrected data. This example does not establish that the comparison was specified before data collection.

Inspect all 20 source rows
Synthetic source data; Day14, one measurement per animal
AnimalSource groupWeight (g)Earlier input group
M01Control24.1Control
M02Control25.2Control
M03Control23.8Control
M04Control26.0Control
M05Control24.7Control
M06Control25.5Control
M07Control23.9Control
M08Control24.8Control
M09Control25.0Control
M10Treatment22.8Treatment
M11Treatment23.4Treatment
M12Treatment21.9Treatment
M13Treatment24.1Treatment
M14Treatment22.6Treatment
M15Treatment23.0Treatment
M16Treatment22.2Treatment
M17Control26.2Treatment
M18Treatment23.7Treatment
M19Treatment21.8Treatment
M20Treatment22.9Treatment